Hi Andreas,
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On the other hand, sockets and shmem are both relatively large...
shmem is only large because the union is large. I introduced the
direct swap array of size SHMEM_NR_DIRECT simply to take advantage of
the union. We can decrease SHMEM_NR_DIRECT very easily. I am thinking
about 1 or 5 which would mean that we allocate an indirect block for
files bigger than 4k or 20k respectively.
The shmem_inode_info would then be 8 or 12 words.
Greetings
Christoph
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mount... Christoph Rohland
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? David L. Parsley
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Alexander Viro
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Ed Tomlinson
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Andreas Dilger
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Alexander Viro
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Erik Mouw
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoint... Andreas Dilger
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mount... Alexander Viro
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mount... Erik Mouw
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mount... Christoph Rohland
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Andreas Dilger
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoint... Alexander Viro

