On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 09:10:07AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > ptrace only operates on processes that are stopped. So there are no > locking issues - we've synchronized on a much higher level than a > spinlock or semaphore. This is only true for requests other than PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_ATTACH is exactly what I'm worried about. regards Christian -- THAT'S ALL FOLKS! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: BUG: Global FPU corruption in 2.... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: BUG: Global FPU corruption i... Victor Zandy
- Re: BUG: Global FPU corruption i... Ulrich Drepper
- Re: BUG: Global FPU corrupt... David Konerding
- Re: BUG: Global FPU cor... Alan Cox
- Re: BUG: Global FPU corruption in 2.2 kees
- Re: BUG: Global FPU corruption in 2.2 Christian Ehrhardt
- Re: BUG: Global FPU corruption in 2.2 Erik Paulson
- Re: BUG: Global FPU corruption in 2.2 Linus Torvalds
- Re: BUG: Global FPU corruption in 2.2 Alan Cox
- Re: BUG: Global FPU corruption in 2.2 Christian Ehrhardt
- Re: BUG: Global FPU corruption in 2.... Michal Jaegermann
- BUG: USB/Reboot Collectively Unconscious
- Re: BUG: USB/Reboot Alan Cox
- Re: BUG: USB/Reboot Collectively Unconscious
- Re: BUG: USB/Reboot Alan Cox
- Re: BUG: USB/Reboot Collectively Unconscious
- Re: BUG: Global FPU corruption in 2.2 alad
- Re: BUG: Global FPU corruption in 2.2 alad
- Re: BUG: Global FPU corruption in 2.2 alad
- Re: BUG: Global FPU corruption in 2.2 Victor Zandy