On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 27 March 2013, Rob Herring wrote: > > No, I was thinking in the case of Xen and mach-virt, you would not set > > mdesc->smp. So you would have something like this: > > > > if (mdesc->smp) > > smp_set_ops(mdesc->smp); > > else > > smp_set_ops(&psci_smp_ops); > > The case that Stefano is interested in if obviously other platforms > that can either run as Dom0 under Xen with psci_smp_ops or natively > with their own smp_ops. A similar case would be a platform that > may implement psci using smc when run in secure mode but provide > its own smp_ops when run natively.
That's correct. > In both cases, it would be simpler to use psci if available but > fall back to mdesc->smp otherwise. I agree. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
