3.6.11.1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Paul Moore <pmo...@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit a6a8fe950e1b8596bb06f2c89c3a1a4bf2011ba9 ]

My last patch to solve a problem where the static/fallback labels were
not fully displayed resulted in build problems when IPv6 was disabled.
This patch resolves the IPv6 build problems; sorry for the screw-up.

Please queue for -stable or simply merge with the previous patch.

Reported-by: Kbuild Test Robot <fengguang...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmo...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
---
 net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c |   15 +++++----------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c 
b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
index e7ff694..c39d63c 100644
--- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
+++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
@@ -1189,8 +1189,6 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlist(struct sk_buff *skb,
        struct netlbl_unlhsh_walk_arg cb_arg;
        u32 skip_bkt = cb->args[0];
        u32 skip_chain = cb->args[1];
-       u32 skip_addr4 = cb->args[2];
-       u32 skip_addr6 = cb->args[3];
        u32 iter_bkt;
        u32 iter_chain = 0, iter_addr4 = 0, iter_addr6 = 0;
        struct netlbl_unlhsh_iface *iface;
@@ -1215,7 +1213,7 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlist(struct sk_buff *skb,
                                continue;
                        netlbl_af4list_foreach_rcu(addr4,
                                                   &iface->addr4_list) {
-                               if (iter_addr4++ < skip_addr4)
+                               if (iter_addr4++ < cb->args[2])
                                        continue;
                                if (netlbl_unlabel_staticlist_gen(
                                              NLBL_UNLABEL_C_STATICLIST,
@@ -1231,7 +1229,7 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlist(struct sk_buff *skb,
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
                        netlbl_af6list_foreach_rcu(addr6,
                                                   &iface->addr6_list) {
-                               if (iter_addr6++ < skip_addr6)
+                               if (iter_addr6++ < cb->args[3])
                                        continue;
                                if (netlbl_unlabel_staticlist_gen(
                                              NLBL_UNLABEL_C_STATICLIST,
@@ -1273,12 +1271,9 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlistdef(struct sk_buff 
*skb,
 {
        struct netlbl_unlhsh_walk_arg cb_arg;
        struct netlbl_unlhsh_iface *iface;
-       u32 skip_addr4 = cb->args[0];
-       u32 skip_addr6 = cb->args[1];
-       u32 iter_addr4 = 0;
+       u32 iter_addr4 = 0, iter_addr6 = 0;
        struct netlbl_af4list *addr4;
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
-       u32 iter_addr6 = 0;
        struct netlbl_af6list *addr6;
 #endif
 
@@ -1292,7 +1287,7 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlistdef(struct sk_buff 
*skb,
                goto unlabel_staticlistdef_return;
 
        netlbl_af4list_foreach_rcu(addr4, &iface->addr4_list) {
-               if (iter_addr4++ < skip_addr4)
+               if (iter_addr4++ < cb->args[0])
                        continue;
                if (netlbl_unlabel_staticlist_gen(NLBL_UNLABEL_C_STATICLISTDEF,
                                              iface,
@@ -1305,7 +1300,7 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlistdef(struct sk_buff 
*skb,
        }
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
        netlbl_af6list_foreach_rcu(addr6, &iface->addr6_list) {
-               if (iter_addr6++ < skip_addr6)
+               if (iter_addr6++ < cb->args[1])
                        continue;
                if (netlbl_unlabel_staticlist_gen(NLBL_UNLABEL_C_STATICLISTDEF,
                                              iface,
-- 
1.7.10.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to