If we reenable ftrace via syctl, we currently set ftrace_trace_function
based on the previous simplistic algorithm. This is inconsistent with
what update_ftrace_function does. So better call that helper instead.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com>
---
 kernel/trace/ftrace.c |    8 ++------
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 62b71f6..b9b90f0 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -4538,12 +4538,8 @@ ftrace_enable_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
                ftrace_startup_sysctl();
 
                /* we are starting ftrace again */
-               if (ftrace_ops_list != &ftrace_list_end) {
-                       if (ftrace_ops_list->next == &ftrace_list_end)
-                               ftrace_trace_function = ftrace_ops_list->func;
-                       else
-                               ftrace_trace_function = ftrace_ops_list_func;
-               }
+               if (ftrace_ops_list != &ftrace_list_end)
+                       update_ftrace_function();
 
        } else {
                /* stopping ftrace calls (just send to ftrace_stub) */
-- 
1.7.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to