On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:03:21 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:
> > IMO the local scope is more obvious as this is and should only be used > > for caching purposes. > > It's a pattern we actively avoid in kernel code. On the contrary, I always encourage people to move the static definitions into function scope if possible. So the reader can see the identifier's scope without having to search the whole file. Unnecessarily giving the identifier file-scope seems weird. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
