On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:43:50PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I tested this out by just having a process that keeps stat'ing the
> same /proc inode over and over and over again, which should be pretty
> much the worst-case situation (because we will delete the dentry after
> each stat, and so we'll repopulate it for each stat)
>
> The allocation overhead seems to be in the noise. The real costs are
> all in proc_lookup_de() just finding the entry, with strlen/strcmp
> being much hotter. So if we actually care about performance for these
> cases, what we would actually want to do is to just cache the dentries
> and have some kind of timeout instead of getting rid of them
> immediately. That would get rid of the lookup costs, and in the
> process also get rid of the constant inode allocation/deallocation
> costs.
As far as I can see, the whole thing is fairly cold, both the globals
and per-netns stuff... /proc/<pid> is a different story, and /proc/sys
can also get hit quite a bit, but those... nope.
> There was also some locking overhead, but that's also mainly
> dentry-related, with the inode side being visible but not dominant.
> Again, not immediately expiring the dentries would make all that just
> go away.
>
> Regardless, the patch seems to be the right thing to do. It actually
> simplifies /proc, seems to fix the problem for Dave, and is small and
> should be trivial to backport. I've committed it and marked it for
> stable. Let's hope there won't be any nasty surprises, but it does
> seem to be the simplest non-hacky patch.
ACK. It might make sense to look into the making procfs retain dentries
better, but I seriously suspect that we would get much bigger win simply
from
* refusing to create an entry with numeric name in procfs root
* reordering the proc_root_lookup() - try the per-process first.
The thing is, proc_pid_lookup() will start with looking if name is a decimal
number; that'll immediately reject the ones that should be handled by
proc_lookup(). proc_lookup() miss, OTOH, costs more. Sure, the length
won't match for the most of them, but grabbing spinlock / walking the list /
comparing the legth for each entry / dropping the spinlock is going to be
more costly than checking that a short string isn't a decimal number. And
we look there for /proc/<pid>/something a lot more...
IOW, I suspect that something like (very lightly tested) patch below would
be more useful than anything we can get from playing with dcache retention.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 69078c7..02b07c7 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -2727,12 +2727,12 @@ out:
struct dentry *proc_pid_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry * dentry,
unsigned int flags)
{
- struct dentry *result = NULL;
+ struct dentry *result = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
struct task_struct *task;
unsigned tgid;
struct pid_namespace *ns;
- tgid = name_to_int(dentry);
+ tgid = name_to_int(&dentry->d_name);
if (tgid == ~0U)
goto out;
@@ -2990,7 +2990,7 @@ static struct dentry *proc_task_lookup(struct inode *dir,
struct dentry * dentry
if (!leader)
goto out_no_task;
- tid = name_to_int(dentry);
+ tid = name_to_int(&dentry->d_name);
if (tid == ~0U)
goto out;
diff --git a/fs/proc/fd.c b/fs/proc/fd.c
index d7a4a28..5f4286c 100644
--- a/fs/proc/fd.c
+++ b/fs/proc/fd.c
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static struct dentry *proc_lookupfd_common(struct inode
*dir,
{
struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(dir);
struct dentry *result = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
- unsigned fd = name_to_int(dentry);
+ unsigned fd = name_to_int(&dentry->d_name);
if (!task)
goto out_no_task;
diff --git a/fs/proc/generic.c b/fs/proc/generic.c
index 4b3b3ff..e13d2da 100644
--- a/fs/proc/generic.c
+++ b/fs/proc/generic.c
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ static struct proc_dir_entry *__proc_create(struct
proc_dir_entry **parent,
{
struct proc_dir_entry *ent = NULL;
const char *fn = name;
- unsigned int len;
+ struct qstr q;
/* make sure name is valid */
if (!name || !strlen(name))
@@ -593,14 +593,17 @@ static struct proc_dir_entry *__proc_create(struct
proc_dir_entry **parent,
if (strchr(fn, '/'))
goto out;
- len = strlen(fn);
+ q.name = fn;
+ q.len = strlen(fn);
+ if (*parent == &proc_root && name_to_int(&q) != ~0U)
+ return NULL;
- ent = kzalloc(sizeof(struct proc_dir_entry) + len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+ ent = kzalloc(sizeof(struct proc_dir_entry) + q.len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ent)
goto out;
- memcpy(ent->name, fn, len + 1);
- ent->namelen = len;
+ memcpy(ent->name, q.name, q.len + 1);
+ ent->namelen = q.len;
ent->mode = mode;
ent->nlink = nlink;
atomic_set(&ent->count, 1);
diff --git a/fs/proc/internal.h b/fs/proc/internal.h
index 85ff3a4..fba6da2 100644
--- a/fs/proc/internal.h
+++ b/fs/proc/internal.h
@@ -123,10 +123,10 @@ static inline int pid_delete_dentry(const struct dentry *
dentry)
return !proc_pid(dentry->d_inode)->tasks[PIDTYPE_PID].first;
}
-static inline unsigned name_to_int(struct dentry *dentry)
+static inline unsigned name_to_int(struct qstr *qstr)
{
- const char *name = dentry->d_name.name;
- int len = dentry->d_name.len;
+ const char *name = qstr->name;
+ int len = qstr->len;
unsigned n = 0;
if (len > 1 && *name == '0')
diff --git a/fs/proc/root.c b/fs/proc/root.c
index c6e9fac..67c9dc4 100644
--- a/fs/proc/root.c
+++ b/fs/proc/root.c
@@ -190,10 +190,10 @@ static int proc_root_getattr(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct
dentry *dentry, struct
static struct dentry *proc_root_lookup(struct inode * dir, struct dentry *
dentry, unsigned int flags)
{
- if (!proc_lookup(dir, dentry, flags))
+ if (!proc_pid_lookup(dir, dentry, flags))
return NULL;
- return proc_pid_lookup(dir, dentry, flags);
+ return proc_lookup(dir, dentry, flags);
}
static int proc_root_readdir(struct file * filp,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
