On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 06:13:42 +0000 "Hampson, Steven T" <steven.t.hamp...@intel.com> wrote:
> Using mbind to change the mempolicy to MPOL_BIND on several adjacent > mmapped blocks > may result in a reset of the mempolicy to MPOL_DEFAULT in vma_adjust. > > ... > > --- a/mm/mmap.c > +++ b/mm/mmap.c > @@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ again: remove_next = 1 + (end > > next->vm_end); > if (next->anon_vma) > anon_vma_merge(vma, next); > mm->map_count--; > - mpol_put(vma_policy(next)); > + vma_set_policy(vma, vma_policy(next)); > kmem_cache_free(vm_area_cachep, next); > /* > * In mprotect's case 6 (see comments on vma_merge), Is this missing an mpol_put(vma_policy(vma))? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
