On 03/18/2013 11:25 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 07:04 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:

I'm not sure why the process would never get back to the schedule, but looking
at the sctp_remaddr_seq_show function, I think that we should convert this
sequence:
        sctp_local_bh_disable();
        read_lock(&head->lock);
        rcu_read_lock();

to this:
        read_lock(&head->lock);
        rcu_read_lock_bh();

Neil

I dont think so.

BH needs to be disabled before read_lock(&head->lock);

or else, write_lock() could deadlock (assuming it can be called from BH)



If anything, this should probably be done like this:

rcu_read_lock();
read_lock_bh(&head->lock)
...

read_unlock_bh(&head->lock)
rcu_read_unlock();

-vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to