On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 07:39:48AM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 10:36:06AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 00:19 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks thats really useful, we might miss to increment socket refcount
> > > in a timer setup.
> > >
> >
> > Hmm, please add following debugging patch as well
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> > index 14f6e9d..fe7c8a6 100644
> > --- a/include/net/sock.h
> > +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> > @@ -530,7 +530,9 @@ static inline void sock_hold(struct sock *sk)
> > */
> > static inline void __sock_put(struct sock *sk)
> > {
> > - atomic_dec(&sk->sk_refcnt);
> > + int newref = atomic_dec_return(&sk->sk_refcnt);
> > +
> > + BUG_ON(newref <= 0);
> > }
>
> Couldn't it also be a free from sock_wfree where the wmem accounting went
> wrong? It does not care about reference counts there.
nvm, it had to be in the stacktrace then.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
