Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl>
---
Untested. Perhaps the first test that people with access to the relevant
hardware might do, is to test _before applying this patch_ with FB_OMAP2
set. Perhaps this negative dependency isn't needed at all. Or is it
obvious?
drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Kconfig
index 09f65dc..45875a0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Kconfig
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
config DRM_OMAP
tristate "OMAP DRM"
- depends on DRM && !CONFIG_FB_OMAP2
+ depends on DRM && !FB_OMAP2
depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM
depends on OMAP2_DSS
select DRM_KMS_HELPER
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
