Hi, On Wed, Mar 13 2013, Seungwon Jeon wrote: > On Tuesday, March 12, 2013, Markos Chandras wrote: >> There is no reason to loop when handling an interrupt. The "if" clauses >> will handle all of them sequentially. This also eliminates the extra loop >> we used to take with no pending interrupts and we ended up breaking out >> of the while loop. >> >> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <[email protected]> >> Cc: Seungwon Jeon <[email protected]> > > Acked-by: Seungwon Jeon <[email protected]> > > You can add my ack to other patches. > However, could you change the subject prefix to 'mmc: dw_mmc' and resend?
It's okay, I'll take care of that when applying this time. Thanks! - Chris. -- Chris Ball <[email protected]> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
