"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpa...@gmail.com> writes:
> Eric et al., > > [CCing Li because of reboot(2) changes] > > I have (I think) addressed all previous comments in the current draft > of the pid_namespaces(7) page. This is a final sanity check before I > call this page complete (modulo any future kernel changes). Baring the 3.9 reference to reboot(2) which should be 3.4 I don't see any problems. I think you have reached the point where if there are any problems left I will just have to send you patches after you publish because my eyes are glassing over and I am not going to see any more problems right now. One of those patches I am going to have to send you is I am fixing the case below for 3.10 > clone(..., CLONE_VM, ...); > setns(fd, CLONE_NEWPID); /* Fails */ > > clone(..., CLONE_VM, ...); > unshare(CLONE_NEWPID); /* Fails */ > It turns out that the check in fork/clone is sufficient. The verbage about all of the namespaces is correct however since unshare(CLONE_NEWPID) doesn't actually change the pid_namespace it doesn't matter. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
