On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Ingo Oeser wrote: > > Are you sure, you can implement SMP-safe, atomic operations (which you need > for all up()/down() in user space) WITHOUT using privileged > instructions on ALL archs Linux supports? Why do you care? Sure, there are broken architectures out there. They'd need system calls. They'd be slow. That's THEIR problem. No sane architecture has this limitation. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: light weight user level semaphores Alexander Viro
- Re: light weight user level semaphores Linus Torvalds
- Re: light weight user level semaphores Alexander Viro
- Re: light weight user level semaphores Ulrich Drepper
- Re: light weight user level semaphores Alan Cox
- Re: light weight user level semaphores Ulrich Drepper
- Re: light weight user level semaphore... Alan Cox
- Re: light weight user level semap... Ulrich Drepper
- Re: light weight user level semaphores Ingo Oeser
- Re: light weight user level semaphores Ulrich Drepper
- Re: light weight user level semaphores Linus Torvalds
- Re: light weight user level semaphores Alan Cox
- Re: light weight user level semaphores Linus Torvalds
- Re: light weight user level semaphores Ulrich Drepper
- Re: light weight user level semaphore... Linus Torvalds
- Re: light weight user level semap... Ulrich Drepper
- Re: light weight user level semap... Alexander Viro
- Re: light weight user level semap... Ulrich Drepper
- Re: light weight user level semaphores Ulrich Drepper
- Re: light weight user level semaphores Alon Ziv
- Re: light weight user level semaphores Alexander Viro