> willing to exercise this power. We would not break compatibility with > any std kernel by instead having a apmd send a "reject all" ioctl > instead, and so deal with events without having the pressure of having > to reject or accept them, and let us remove all the veto code from the > kernel driver. Or am I missing something? That sounds workable. But the same program could reply to the events just as well as issue the ioctl 8) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- RE: Let init know user wants to shutdown Grover, Andrew
- Re: Let init know user wants to shutdown Pavel Machek
- Re: Let init know user wants to shutdown John Fremlin
- RE: Let init know user wants to shutdown Simon Richter
- Re: Let init know user wants to shutdown John Fremlin
- RE: Let init know user wants to shutdown Grover, Andrew
- Re: Let init know user wants to shutdown Alan Cox
- Re: Let init know user wants to shutdown John Fremlin
- Re: Let init know user wants to shutdown Alan Cox
- Re: Let init know user wants to shutdown John Fremlin
- Re: Let init know user wants to shutd... Alan Cox
- Re: Let init know user wants to s... John Fremlin
- Re: Let init know user wants to s... Avery Pennarun
- Re: Let init know user wants to s... John Fremlin
- Re: Let init know user wants to shutd... Pavel Machek
- Re: Let init know user wants to s... John Fremlin
- Re: Let init know user wants to shutdown Pavel Machek
- Re: Let init know user wants to shutdown John Fremlin
- Re: Let init know user wants to shutd... Jamie Lokier
- Re: Let init know user wants to s... John Fremlin
- Re: Let init know user wants to s... Pavel Machek