That fixed it for me. Can you help me understand why sentinel is non-zero? It looks to me like 3.14 allocates 16kB plus strlen of the command line, zeros it, and then proceeds to fill in fields, some differing from what is in the boot_params structure. That said, it looks like the sentinel field should remain 0. I am still trying to understand, but if this patch makes it in, I am happy.
Thanks, Robin On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:12:08AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:22 AM, H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com> wrote: > > Yes, please do the analysis I asked for. > > it uses first 2 pages in bzImage to bootparams. > > then update the fields with ===> X > > struct boot_params { > struct screen_info screen_info; /* 0x000 */ ===> X > struct apm_bios_info apm_bios_info; /* 0x040 */ ===> X > __u8 _pad2[4]; /* 0x054 */ > __u64 tboot_addr; /* 0x058 */ > struct ist_info ist_info; /* 0x060 */ > __u8 _pad3[16]; /* 0x070 */ > __u8 hd0_info[16]; /* obsolete! */ /* 0x080 */ ===> X > __u8 hd1_info[16]; /* obsolete! */ /* 0x090 */ ===> X > struct sys_desc_table sys_desc_table; /* 0x0a0 */ ===> X > struct olpc_ofw_header olpc_ofw_header; /* 0x0b0 */ > __u32 ext_ramdisk_image; /* 0x0c0 */ > __u32 ext_ramdisk_size; /* 0x0c4 */ > __u32 ext_cmd_line_ptr; /* 0x0c8 */ > __u8 _pad4[116]; /* 0x0cc */ > struct edid_info edid_info; /* 0x140 */ > struct efi_info efi_info; /* 0x1c0 */ ===> X > __u32 alt_mem_k; /* 0x1e0 */ ===> X > __u32 scratch; /* Scratch field! */ /* 0x1e4 */ > __u8 e820_entries; /* 0x1e8 */ ===> X > __u8 eddbuf_entries; /* 0x1e9 */ > __u8 edd_mbr_sig_buf_entries; /* 0x1ea */ > __u8 kbd_status; /* 0x1eb */ > __u8 _pad5[3]; /* 0x1ec */ > /* > * The sentinel is set to a nonzero value (0xff) in header.S. > * > * A bootloader is supposed to only take setup_header and put > * it into a clean boot_params buffer. If it turns out that > * it is clumsy or too generous with the buffer, it most > * probably will pick up the sentinel variable too. The fact > * that this variable then is still 0xff will let kernel > * know that some variables in boot_params are invalid and > * kernel should zero out certain portions of boot_params. > */ > __u8 sentinel; /* 0x1ef */ > __u8 _pad6[1]; /* 0x1f0 */ > struct setup_header hdr; /* setup header */ /* 0x1f1 */ ===> X > __u8 _pad7[0x290-0x1f1-sizeof(struct setup_header)]; > __u32 edd_mbr_sig_buffer[EDD_MBR_SIG_MAX]; /* 0x290 */ > struct e820entry e820_map[E820MAX]; /* 0x2d0 */ ===> X > __u8 _pad8[48]; /* 0xcd0 */ > struct edd_info eddbuf[EDDMAXNR]; /* 0xd00 */ > __u8 _pad9[276]; /* 0xeec */ > > so sentinel will be kept as 0xff, so efi_info get cleared by kernel... > > Attached patches should avoid the clearing of efi_info when elilo is used. > > Do we need to clear edd and pad2 and pad3 for elilo? > > Thanks > > Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/