On Monday 04 March 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> FWIW, a patch that is doing what I was initially proposing has been
> merged for 3.9, and it doesn't contain the
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT) test you were proposing (and which I
> think was correct). See:
>
> commit 9ed8a30f3471347c1b763bd062fa78ae80f18eae
> Author: Jingoo Han <jg1....@samsung.com>
> Date: Wed Feb 27 17:02:42 2013 -0800
>
Sigh.
I'll take it as an additional incentive to finally clean up the logic behind
CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT by introducing a CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT_MAP symbol to replace it.
Thanks for the heads up.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
