If NUMAQ is breaking real stuff we can kill it by marking it BROKEN. Rip-out is 3.10 at this stage.
Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote: > >* Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:37:10PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> > I'd be very happy to get the NUMAQ code ripped out. I am wondering >if >> > there are any reasons to keep any 32-bit x86 NUMA code at all. >> >> How much would it hurt us if we said 3.8 is the last kernel that >supported NUMAQ? >> If anyone wants the functionality, they should use 3.8 or older. > >v3.9 - any non-trivial patch in the stage of being contemplated near >the end of the >v3.9 merge window is most likely v3.10 material. > >Thanks, > > Ingo -- Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
