Jesse Pollard replies: to Leif Sawyer who wrote: >> Besides, what would be gained in making the counters RO, if >> they were cleared every time the module was loaded/unloaded? > > 1. Knowlege that the module was reloaded. > 2. Knowlege that the data being measured is correct > 3. Having reliable measures > 4. being able to derive valid statistics > .... Good. Now that we have valid objectives to reach, which of these are NOT met by making the fixes entirely in userspace, say by incorporating a wrapper script to ensure that no external applications can flush the table counters? They're still all met, right? And we haven't had to fill the kernel with more cruft. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Harald Welte
- RE: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Leif Sawyer
- Re: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Ian Stirling
- Re: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Manfred Bartz
- [Counters] Re: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Harald Welte
- Re: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Olaf Titz
- RE: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Leif Sawyer
- RE: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Jesse Pollard
- RE: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Leif Sawyer
- RE: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Jesse Pollard
- Re: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Leif Sawyer
- Re: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Matti Aarnio
- RE: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Michael Clark
- Re: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Manfred Bartz
- RE: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Jesse Pollard
- RE: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Leif Sawyer
- Re: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Manfred Bartz
- Re: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Alan Cox
- Re: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Manfred Bartz
- Re: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Alan Cox
- Re: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Ton Hospel