On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 15:57 -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote: > Hi Mimi, > > You asked me to not come up with new signing scheme and look into IMA > and make use of it. And that's what I am trying to do. As I continue > to do implementation, new concerns crop up and I am raising these.
And I appreciate it. As can be seen by the number of use cases already supported by the integrity subsystem, it doesn't make sense for each case to hash the file independently. You've brought up some valid issues, which I'm trying to help you address, but instead of working them through, your emails basically end by saying "how is IMA going to deal with it" or "it's impossible". Instead lets try to find viable solutions. thanks, Mimi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
