On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 08:43:59PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Matthew Garrett <mj...@srcf.ucam.org> wrote: > > > > If the user has explicitly enrolled a hash then they're stepping outside > > the trust model. > > This is the kind of totally bogus crap that no sane person should ever > spout. Stop it. > > If the user has explicitly enrolled a hash, then that should be the > *primary* trust model, dammit. That should be very much what you > should care about first and foremost, and that should be your goal in > life. That's when the user says "I'm in control of my own machine, and > I want to trust *this*".
The user has stepped outside the original trust model ("I trust anything signed by Microsoft and only things signed by Microsoft") and into a new one ("I trust things that I say I trust"). That's a great thing for a user to do, but it also means that once the user's done it we don't need to give a fuck about what Microsoft think. They're irrelevant once the user's made that choice. > It's not about "stepping outside of the trust model". Quite the > reverse. It's about actually being *part* of the trust model, and > taking control of your own machine. It's the *good* scenario. It's > what you should encourage users to do. I wholeheartedly agree. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/