On 02/20/2013 02:45 PM, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> [meanwhile I posted V6 with the acked-by of linusw and others, that
> were missing in V5]
>
> rmk:
>>> I'm happy to take it through my tree if everyone is now happy with this.
>
> hpa:
>> I am okay with that, although I would like to make sure we do a bunch of
>> x86 randconfigs on it before pushing it to Linus.
>
> I did like this:
> - disable STA2X11 (and thus AMBA) and build
> - enable STA2X11, answer y to all new questions and build
>
> So there's nothing left (you'll have two unrelated warnings, that I'm
> working on and I'll post a fix tomorrow). Sure, Peter, first time I
> didn't do that test and missed some of the drivers.
>
I was just concerned that rmk wouldn't necessarily do those tests as a
matter of process.
So Russell -- how do you want to handle this? Should I take them (and
ask Ingo to put them through his test machinery) or do you want to (and
run x86 randconfigs as part of your testing)?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
