those two sysfs files don't have a 'show' method,
so they shouldn't have a read permission. Thanks
to Greg Kroah-Hartman for actually looking into
the source code and figuring out we had a real bug
with these two files.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com>
---
drivers/base/memory.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c
index 987604d..83d0b17 100644
--- a/drivers/base/memory.c
+++ b/drivers/base/memory.c
@@ -494,8 +494,8 @@ store_hard_offline_page(struct device *dev,
return ret ? ret : count;
}
-static DEVICE_ATTR(soft_offline_page, 0644, NULL, store_soft_offline_page);
-static DEVICE_ATTR(hard_offline_page, 0644, NULL, store_hard_offline_page);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(soft_offline_page, S_IWUSR, NULL, store_soft_offline_page);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(hard_offline_page, S_IWUSR, NULL, store_hard_offline_page);
static __init int memory_fail_init(void)
{
--
1.8.1.rc1.5.g7e0651a
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
