From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebied...@xmission.com>

The assumption that sizeof(uid_t) is the same as sizeof(gid_t) is
completely reasonable but since we can verify the condition at
compile time.

Cc: Steve French <smfre...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebied...@xmission.com>
---
 fs/cifs/cifsacl.c |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c b/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c
index 5cbd00e..2e811f4 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c
@@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ sid_to_id(struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb, struct cifs_sid 
*psid,
         * probably a safe assumption but might be better to check based on
         * sidtype.
         */
+       BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(uid_t) != sizeof(gid_t));
        if (sidkey->datalen != sizeof(uid_t)) {
                rc = -EIO;
                cFYI(1, "%s: Downcall contained malformed key "
-- 
1.7.5.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to