On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:26:46 -0700, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: > On 02/11/2013 03:19 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > > of_get_next_available_child() obtains the devtree_lock and then calls > > of_device_is_available() which also attempts to claim the lock. This is > > obviously incorrect and causes a deadlock on boot. Fix issue by adding > > an variant of of_device_is_available() which doesn't obtain the lock. > > This patch forgets to update __of_device_is_available() to call > __of_get_property() rather than of_get_property() and hence doesn't > actually solve the problem. > > You might want to make __of_device_is_available() static too.
Okay, I've dropped this patch and replaced it with your version since you're actually doing better testing that I it would appear. I had to respin my tree anyway because I messed up a merge of Rob's branch. :-( Sorry for the noise. New version of the tree is pushed out. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
