On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 11:06 +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > The domain flag SD_PREFER_SIBLING was set both on MC and CPU domain at > frist commit b5d978e0c7e79a, and was removed uncarefully when clear up > obsolete power scheduler. Then commit 6956dc568 recover the flag on CPU > domain only. It works, but it introduces a extra domain level since this > cause MC/CPU different. > > So, recover the the flag in MC domain too to remove a domain level in > x86 platform.
This fails to clearly state why its desirable.. I'm guessing its because we should use sibling cache domains before sibling threads, right? A clearly stated reason is always preferable over: it was this way, make it so again; which leaves us wondering why. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/