> It's currently done this way, ld-linux.so looks in a special "686" path when > the ELF vector mentions it, otherwise normal path. There is a special 686 > version of glibc and linuxthread. Just it's a very complicated and disk > space chewing solution for a simple problem (some distributions are starting > to drop support for 386 because of that) So drop your support for that distribution. I do not see the problem here. Look at PS/2 support as another example. Supporting the IBM PS/2 machines is commercially impractical and has no business case. Red Hat won't install on a PS/2 machine. Debian has different constraints and guess what - Debian installs beautifully on a PS/2. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix David Weinehall
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix David Weinehall
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Tim Wright
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix David Howells
- Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Maciej W. Rozycki