Hi Toshi,
2013/02/07 7:50, Toshi Kani wrote:
> Changed sysfs eject, acpi_eject_store(), to support ACPI scan handlers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.k...@hp.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index cfd7a69..3ff632e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ acpi_eject_store(struct device *d, struct
> device_attribute *attr,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> #ifndef FORCE_EJECT
> - if (acpi_device->driver == NULL) {
> + if (!acpi_device->driver && !acpi_device->handler) {
I don't understand the fix.
The if sentence becomes true, when both acpi_device->driver and
acpi_device->handler
are NULL. It means that acpi_eject_store() runs if either acpi_device->driver or
acpi_device->handler has pointer. Is it O.K.?
I think it should be if (!acpi_device->driver || !acpi_device->handler).
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
> ret = -ENODEV;
> goto err;
> }
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
