On Wed 06-02-13 09:58:48, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, Jan Kara wrote:
> 
> >   Yes, I noticed that thread just yesterday and also though that using
> > similar trick might be viable. I'll experiment if we could use the same
> > method for handling lockup problems I hit. Steven seems to have already
> > tweaked PRINTK_PENDING stuff to be usable more easily...
> > 
> 
> Are these new build failures in linux-next coming from this patch?
> 
> kernel/printk.c: In function 'console_unlock':
> kernel/printk.c:2156:18: error: 'printk_work' undeclared (first use in this 
> function)
> kernel/printk.c:2156:18: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only 
> once for each function it appears in
> kernel/printk.c: At top level:
> kernel/printk.c:2167:13: warning: 'printk_worker' defined but not used 
> [-Wunused-function]
  Yes, I already sent a patch to fix these (attached if you need it).
Thanks for notice.

                                                        Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
>From 313ba66418472fa532faf8c61e8981bd7b29950e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:07:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] printk: Fixup compilation with !CONFIG_PRINTK

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
---
 kernel/printk.c |    8 ++++----
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/printk.c b/kernel/printk.c
index 80172f7..484fdb4 100644
--- a/kernel/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk.c
@@ -246,10 +246,6 @@ static enum log_flags console_prev;
 static u64 clear_seq;
 static u32 clear_idx;
 
-/* Worker to print accumulated data to console when there's too much of it */
-static void printk_worker(struct work_struct *work);
-static DECLARE_WORK(printk_work, printk_worker);
-
 #define PREFIX_MAX		32
 #define LOG_LINE_MAX		1024 - PREFIX_MAX
 
@@ -2154,6 +2150,10 @@ skip:
 	return retry;
 }
 
+/* Worker to print accumulated data to console when there's too much of it */
+static void printk_worker(struct work_struct *work);
+static DECLARE_WORK(printk_work, printk_worker);
+
 void console_unlock(void)
 {
 	if (__console_unlock()) {
-- 
1.7.1

Reply via email to