From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brande...@gmail.com>
Scaling drivers that implement cpufreq_driver.setpolicy() have
internal governors that do not signal changes via
cpufreq_notify_transition() so the frequncy in the policy will almost
certainly be different than the current frequncy. Only call
cpufreq_out_of_sync() when the underlying driver implements
cpufreq_driver.target()
Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brande...@intel.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index bb45f93..0ba0344 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1798,7 +1798,7 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
pr_debug("Driver did not initialize current freq");
data->cur = policy.cur;
} else {
- if (data->cur != policy.cur)
+ if (data->cur != policy.cur && driver->target)
cpufreq_out_of_sync(cpu, data->cur,
policy.cur);
}
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
