On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, liguang wrote:

> srat table should present only on acpi domain,
> seems mm/ is not the right place for it.
> 
> Reviewed-by: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com>

I certainly didn't review this, please read 
Documentation/SubmittingPatches.

> Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>

Couple of issues with this:

 - it doesn't include your followup change "acpi: change Makefile for
   srat.c building" which is required for this to build, please fold it in 
   and repost,

 - there is whitespace damage, we use tabs for indentation in Makefiles,

 - you're basing your patches on Linus' tree when arch/x86/mm/srat has
   changed in linux-next (15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)), please 
   rebase this on the linux-next tree at git.kernel.org.

Otherwise, looks good.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to