Hi Jiri,

On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 11:05:06 +0100 Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote:
>
> >diff --cc net/ipv6/route.c
> >index 363d8b7,f3328bc..0000000
> >--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> >+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> >@@@ -928,7 -884,7 +884,7 @@@ restart
> >     dst_hold(&rt->dst);
> >     read_unlock_bh(&table->tb6_lock);
> >  
> >-    if (!rt->n && !(rt->rt6i_flags & (RTF_NONEXTHOP | RTF_LOCAL)))
> > -   if (!(rt->rt6i_flags & (RTF_NONEXTHOP | RTF_GATEWAY)))
> >++   if (!(rt->rt6i_flags & (RTF_NONEXTHOP | RTF_LOCAL | RTF_GATEWAY)))
> 
> I believe that no change here is correct to do. RTF_LOCAL here is needed
> only before Yoshifuji's "IPv6 rt->n removal"

Thanks for the feedback.  I have removed the " | RTF_LOCAL" from the
merge resolution.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    s...@canb.auug.org.au

Attachment: pgp9LWRTV9W_k.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to