A simple test to make sure we handle rwlocks correctly.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.le...@oracle.com>
---
tools/lib/lockdep/tests/WW.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/lib/lockdep/tests/WW.c
diff --git a/tools/lib/lockdep/tests/WW.c b/tools/lib/lockdep/tests/WW.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4b1be0f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/lib/lockdep/tests/WW.c
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+#include <liblockdep/rwlock.h>
+
+void main(void)
+{
+ pthread_rwlock_t a, b;
+
+ liblockdep_init();
+ liblockdep_set_thread();
+
+ pthread_rwlock_init(&a, NULL);
+ pthread_rwlock_init(&b, NULL);
+
+ pthread_rwlock_wrlock(&a);
+ pthread_rwlock_rdlock(&b);
+ pthread_rwlock_wrlock(&a);
+}
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
