> That's a very low sampling rate, yet I think it would be rejected by your > code.
You mean allowed? > But if I come in with frequency 0x7fffffff+1, then that's a very high > frequency, thus > small period, I would pass the test. So I think you need to reinforce the test > for freq=1. I'm aware that there are some configs that can slip through, but there's no other choice if we still allow guest perf stat. The cutoff is somewhat arbitary. It's not a correctness problem, just things can be unexpectedly slower and you may see unexpected NMI messages. -Andi -- a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
