Ying has noticed me (via private email) that the patch is bogus because
the break out condition is incorrect. She said she would post a fix
but she's been probably too busy. If she doesn't oppose, could you add
the follow up fix, please?

I am really sorry about this mess.
---
>From 6d23b59e96b8173fae2d0d397cb5e99f16899874 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ying Han <ying...@google.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:42:28 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mmotm:
 memcgvmscan-do-not-break-out-targeted-reclaim-without-reclaimed-pages.patch
 fix

We should break out of the hierarchy loop only if nr_reclaimed exceeded
nr_to_reclaim and not vice-versa. This patch fixes the condition.

Signed-off-by: Ying Han <ying...@google.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index d75c1ec..7528eae 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1985,7 +1985,7 @@ static void shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct 
scan_control *sc)
                         * whole hierarchy is not sufficient.
                         */
                        if (!global_reclaim(sc) &&
-                                       sc->nr_to_reclaim >= sc->nr_reclaimed) {
+                                       sc->nr_to_reclaim <= sc->nr_reclaimed) {
                                mem_cgroup_iter_break(root, memcg);
                                break;
                        }
-- 
1.7.10.4

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to