2013/1/29 Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>: > On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 03:39 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > >> Please send me your kernelspin so I can test as well. > > http://rostedt.homelinux.com/private/kernelspin.c
I can't reproduce your issue. I'm getting almost the same results with vtime + force context tracking and tick based cputime. 3 runs with tick based cputime: real 0m10.005s user 0m0.210s sys 0m9.780s real 0m10.005s user 0m0.170s sys 0m9.820s real 0m10.005s user 0m0.130s sys 0m9.860s 3 runs with vtime + context tracking forced: real 0m10.005s user 0m0.807s sys 0m9.197s real 0m10.005s user 0m0.832s sys 0m9.172s real 0m10.005s user 0m0.787s sys 0m9.218s > http://rostedt.homelinux.com/private/userspin.c > > -- Steve > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
