Yes. Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:
> >* H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com> wrote: > >> On 01/25/2013 12:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >> >> >> I don't see anything wrong, except that I can't *find* patch 3/3 >either >> >> in my inbox nor on LKML... >> > >> > I can certainly resend the whole set, but our email system even >> > got a delivery confirmation from yours on patch 3 (other than >> > e.g. from Ingo's, and all of this identical to 0...2). >> > >> > Or see https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1688991/, according >> > to which you even responded to it (which is the concern Ingo was >> > referring to). >> > >> >> Ah yes, now I have the context. >> >> And with that, I have to NAK the patch. I did talk to the KVM >> people and they confirmed that this is NOT something they >> want. They do not program VT-x to VMEXIT on CR0 changes. >> >> So this is Xen-specific, and penalizing other hypervisors is >> wrong. > >Are patches #1 and #2 still OK? > >Thanks, > > Ingo -- Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
