On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 16:04:22, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> On 1/25/2013 11:43 AM, Mrugesh Katepallewar wrote:
> > Add RTC DT entries in da850 dts file.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mrugesh Katepallewar <mrugesh...@ti.com>
> > ---
> > Applies on top of v3.8-rc4 of linus tree.
> > 
> > Tested on da850-evm device.
> > 
> > Test Procedure:
> > date [YYYY.]MM.DD-hh:mm[:ss]
> > hwclock -w
> > reset board and check system time.
> > 
> > :100644 100644 37dc5a3... b16efd4... M      arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts
> > :100644 100644 640ab75... a8eb1b1... M      arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts |    3 +++
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi    |    8 ++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts 
> > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts index 37dc5a3..b16efd4 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts
> > @@ -24,5 +24,8 @@
> >             serial2: serial@1d0d000 {
> >                     status = "okay";
> >             };
> > +           rtc@1c23000 {
> > +                   status = "okay";
> > +           };
> >     };
> >  };
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi 
> > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi index 640ab75..a8eb1b1 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
> > @@ -56,5 +56,13 @@
> >                     interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> >                     status = "disabled";
> >             };
> > +           rtc@1c23000 {
> > +                   compatible = "ti,da830-rtc";
> > +                   reg = <0x23000 0x1000>;
> > +                   interrupts = <19
> > +                                 19>;
> 
> Why two interrupts of the same number? If there is only one interrupt line 
> then only one should be specified, no?
We are using common OMAP RTC driver for da850 and other ti SoC's (e.g.am33xx). 
I have seen in am33xx.dtsi rtc timer
and alarm interrupts are different. So, two interrupt numbers are expected from 
RTC DT node.
> 
> Thanks,
> Sekhar
> 


Regards, 
Mrugesh

Reply via email to