On 01/24/2013 09:25 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:56:26AM -0600, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> There has been occasional talk about a -Ok(ernel) option to gcc, but
>> that would require someone to go through gcc and figure out what bits
>> makes sense and which don't...
>
> Yep, such an option has a great potential for us and, if done right,
> would be very cool. It could probably be taught to insert HWEIGHT,
> RDRAND, CLFLUSH and whatever other insns we have the inline asm versions
> for... and query CPUID before that... uuh, nice stuff.
>
> The alternative would be to fork gcc and call it kcc...
>
> /me runs away pretty quickly without even turning back :-)
>
I don't expect we'll be teaching gcc about the alternatives mechanism.
-Ok was about optimization, basically a "sane -Os".
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
