On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:03:10AM -0400, Hubertus Franke wrote: > I understand the dilemma that the Linux scheduler is in, namely satisfy > the low end at all cost. [..] We can satisfy the low end by making the numa scheduler at compile time (that's what I did in my patch at least). Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: a quest for a better schedul... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Hubertus Franke
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Ingo Molnar
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Tim Wright
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Christopher Smith
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Timothy D. Witham
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Christopher Smith
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Timothy D. Witham
- Re: a quest for a better sched... Michael Peddemors
- Re: a quest for a better sched... Nathan Straz
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Khalid Aziz
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Hubertus Franke
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Hubertus Franke
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Hubertus Franke
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Hubertus Franke
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Hubertus Franke
- RE: a quest for a better scheduler Torrey Hoffman
- RE: a quest for a better scheduler Hubertus Franke
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Yoav Etsion