On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 22:01 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> As you can see, I haven't implemented the rmdir yet.

I decided to implement this too :-)

static int instance_rmdir(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry)
{
        struct dentry *parent;
        int ret;

        /* Paranoid: Make sure the parent is the "instances" directory */
        parent = hlist_entry(inode->i_dentry.first, struct dentry, d_alias);
        if (WARN_ON_ONCE(parent != trace_instance_dir))
                return -ENOENT;

        /* The caller did a dget() on dentry */
        mutex_unlock(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);

        /*
         * The inode mutex is locked, but debugfs_create_dir() will also
         * take the mutex. As the instances directory can not be destroyed
         * or changed in any other way, it is safe to unlock it, and
         * let the dentry try. If two users try to make the same dir at
         * the same time, then the instance_delete() will determine the
         * winner.
         */
        mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);

        ret = instance_delete(dentry->d_iname);

        mutex_lock_nested(&inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
        mutex_lock(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);

        return ret;
}

static const struct inode_operations instance_dir_inode_operations = {
        .lookup         = simple_lookup,
        .mkdir          = instance_mkdir,
        .rmdir          = instance_rmdir,
};


I ran it under lockdep and it didn't complain.

-- Steve



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to