* Ohad Ben-Cohen <o...@wizery.com> [130118 12:58]: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Cong Ding <ding...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The pointer obj is dereferenced in line 146 and 149 respectively, so it is > > not > > necessary to check null again in line 149 and 175. And I have checked that > > all > > the callers of these two functions guarantee the parameter obj passed is not > > null. > > > > Signed-off-by: Cong Ding <ding...@gmail.com> > > Acked-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <o...@wizery.com>
Yes looks like that's a pointless check and would already obj being NULL would fail earlier in those functions: Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
