On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 15:50 +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > Thanks for your suggestions and example, Mike! > I just can't understand the your last words here, Sorry. what the > detailed concern of you on 'both performance profiles with either > metric'? Could you like to give your preferred solutions?
Hm.. I'll try rephrasing. Any power saving gain will of necessity be paid for in latency currency. I don't have a solution other than make a button, let the user decide whether history influences fast path task placement or not. Any other decision maker will get it wrong. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
