>>> On 17.01.13 at 13:22, Matt Wilson <m...@amazon.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 04:22:49PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> We have the framework to use v2, but there are no backends that
>> actually use it. The end result is that on PV we use v2 grants
>> and on PVHVM v1. The v1 has a capacity of 512 grants per page while
>> the v2 has 256 grants per page. This means we lose about 50%
>> capacity - and if we want more than 16 VIFs (each VIF takes
>> 512 grants), then we are hitting the max per guest of 32.
>> 
>> Note: The hypervisor provides an over-ride for the default
>> of 32 frames (pages) per guest: gnttab_max_nr_frames=X
> 
> I think it would be better if the dom0/service domain and hypervisor
> prevent the guest from setting the version to 2 if the backend isn't
> going to make use of them. In the short term, we could add a Xen
> option to limit the supported version to 1.

But that's something each guest has to decide for itself.

Anyway - if no-one's using v2, what did it get introduced for
(not only in the hypervisor, but also in the kernel)? I thought
the networking drivers were intended to make use of it...

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to