In function rpm_suspend/resume(), when going into the for(;;),
the pre-condition judgement has been done, and the variable runtime_status
are always protected by &power.lock, so it is not necessary to judge
them again before unlock_irq &power.lock in for(;;).

This patch clean them up.

Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng....@intel.com>
---
 drivers/base/power/runtime.c |   18 +++++++++---------
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
index 3148b10..32d6497 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
@@ -377,14 +377,14 @@ static int rpm_suspend(struct device *dev, int rpmflags)
                for (;;) {
                        prepare_to_wait(&dev->power.wait_queue, &wait,
                                        TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-                       if (dev->power.runtime_status != RPM_SUSPENDING)
-                               break;
 
                        spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
 
                        schedule();
 
                        spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
+                       if (dev->power.runtime_status != RPM_SUSPENDING)
+                               break;
                }
                finish_wait(&dev->power.wait_queue, &wait);
                goto repeat;
@@ -557,15 +557,15 @@ static int rpm_resume(struct device *dev, int rpmflags)
                for (;;) {
                        prepare_to_wait(&dev->power.wait_queue, &wait,
                                        TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-                       if (dev->power.runtime_status != RPM_RESUMING
-                           && dev->power.runtime_status != RPM_SUSPENDING)
-                               break;
 
                        spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
 
                        schedule();
 
                        spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
+                       if (dev->power.runtime_status != RPM_RESUMING
+                           && dev->power.runtime_status != RPM_SUSPENDING)
+                               break;
                }
                finish_wait(&dev->power.wait_queue, &wait);
                goto repeat;
@@ -989,15 +989,15 @@ static void __pm_runtime_barrier(struct device *dev)
                for (;;) {
                        prepare_to_wait(&dev->power.wait_queue, &wait,
                                        TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-                       if (dev->power.runtime_status != RPM_SUSPENDING
-                           && dev->power.runtime_status != RPM_RESUMING
-                           && !dev->power.idle_notification)
-                               break;
                        spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
 
                        schedule();
 
                        spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
+                       if (dev->power.runtime_status != RPM_SUSPENDING
+                           && dev->power.runtime_status != RPM_RESUMING
+                           && !dev->power.idle_notification)
+                               break;
                }
                finish_wait(&dev->power.wait_queue, &wait);
        }
-- 
1.7.0.4



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to