On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 10:21 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 10 January 2013, Tony Prisk wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 21:27 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > > Should patches in pull-requests have Ack'd lines already? > > > > This is what I thought - and the reason I haven't sent a pull-request > > for the patch's - I haven't had any Ack's :) > > > > Sorry, I think I misunderstood the question then. I meant that if > you received an Acked-by statement, it should be part of the > changeset comment by the time you send a pull request. > > There is also the rule that patches need to be reviewed on the > mailing list before you submit them for inclusion. Like all > rules, this can be bent a little for patches that are obvious > correct bug fixes, especially when you are the platform > maintainer. What you can do here is send the patches out to the > mailing list without any additional Acks and send the pull > request as the [PATCH 0/X] mail. We can then look at the > patches if necessary or just pull in the branch straight away. > > Arnd > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
All makes sense now - thanks. Regards Tony P -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
