On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 01:55:14PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: [...] > > We can use mempressure w/o memcg, and even then it can (or should :) be > > useful (for cpuset, for example). > > The problem is that you end with, at the very least, duplicate > hierarchical accounting mechanisms which overlap with each other > while, most likely, being slightly different. About the same thing > happened with cpu and cpuacct controllers and we're now trying to > deprecate the latter.
Yeah. I started answering your comments about hierarchical accounting, looked into the memcg code, and realized that *this* is where I need the memcg stuff. :) Thus yes, I guess I'll have to integrate it with memcg, or sort of. I will surely Cc you on the next interations. Thanks, Anton -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
