From: "Pavel Machek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Is the computer otherwise idle?
> > I've seen one unexplainable report with atm problems that
disappeared
> > (!) if a kernel compile was running.
>
> I've seen similar bugs. If you hook something on schedule_tq and
forget
> to set current->need_resched, this is exactly what you get.
>
I'm running with a patch that printk's if cpu_idle() is called while a
softirq is pending.
If I access the floppy on my K6/200 every track triggers the check, and
sometimes the console blanking code triggers it.
What about creating a special cpu_is_idle() function that the idle
functions must call before sleeping?
--
Manfred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Serial port latency Paul Fulghum
- Re: Serial port latency Theodore Tso
- Re: Serial port latency Geir Thomassen
- Re: Serial port latency Jonathan Lundell
- Re: Serial port latency Pavel Machek
- Re: Serial port latency Geir Thomassen
- Re: Serial port latency Geir Thomassen
- Re: Serial port latency Trent Jarvi
- Re: Serial port latency Manfred Spraul
- Re: Serial port latency Pavel Machek
- Re: Serial port latency Manfred Spraul
- Re: Serial port latency Pavel Machek
- Re: Serial port latency Manfred Spraul
- softirq buggy [Re: Serial port latency] Pavel Machek
- Re: softirq buggy [Re: Serial port ... Manfred Spraul
- Re: softirq buggy [Re: Serial p... Pavel Machek
- Re: softirq buggy [Re: Serial p... Manfred Spraul
- Re: softirq buggy [Re: Serial p... kuznet
- Re: softirq buggy [Re: Serial p... Manfred Spraul
- Re: softirq buggy [Re: Serial p... kuznet
- Re: softirq buggy [Re: Serial p... Manfred Spraul

