While load balancing an rq target, we look for the busiest group.
This operation may require an uptodate rq clock if we end up calling
scale_rt_power(). To this end, update it manually if the target is
running tickless.

DOUBT: don't we actually also need this in vanilla kernel, in case
this_cpu is in dyntick-idle mode?

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Cc: Alessio Igor Bogani <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
Cc: Geoff Levand <[email protected]>
Cc: Gilad Ben Yossef <[email protected]>
Cc: Hakan Akkan <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Li Zhong <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |   13 +++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 698137d..473f50f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5023,6 +5023,19 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
 
        schedstat_inc(sd, lb_count[idle]);
 
+       /*
+        * find_busiest_group() may need an uptodate cpu clock
+        * for find_busiest_group() (see scale_rt_power()). If
+        * the CPU is nohz, it's clock may be stale.
+        */
+       if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(this_cpu)) {
+               local_irq_save(flags);
+               raw_spin_lock(&this_rq->lock);
+               update_rq_clock(this_rq);
+               raw_spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
+               local_irq_restore(flags);
+       }
+
 redo:
        group = find_busiest_group(&env, balance);
 
-- 
1.7.5.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to