On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 12:18:21AM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 01:42:37PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > >> To be clear, I have all of these in the queue: > >> > >> be03d4a45c09 rt2x00: Don't let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDU subframe > >> fails > >> 5b632fe85ec8 mac80211: introduce IEEE80211_HW_TEARDOWN_AGGR_ON_BAR_FAIL > >> ab9d6e4ffe19 Revert: "rt2x00: Don't let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDU > >> subframe fails" > >> > >> and I'm intending to drop/defer them all. > > > > Patch 3 is a revert of patch 1 (questioned patch). Please apply all 3 > > patches, > > or only patch 2. > > Despite its title, isn't patch 3 not exactly a revert? It includes a > change that depends on patch 2. I don't think patch 2 alone would > have any effect.
Yes, all 3 patches should go in. Stanislaw -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
